P2580 - The Efficacy of Maintenance Treatment with Guselkumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Phase 3 QUASAR Maintenance Study Results at Week 44 by Biologic/Janus Kinase History
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA
Jessica R. Allegretti, MD, MPH, FACG1, Julián Panés, MD2, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, MD, PhD3, Bruce E.. Sands, MD, FACG4, Shadi Yarandi, PhD5, Kuan-Hsiang G. Huang, MD, PhD6, Matthew Germinaro, MD6, Jia Zhan, PhD6, Hongyan Zhang, PhD6, Jakob Begun, MD, PhD7, Jarosław Kierkuś, MD, PhD8, Tetiana Kravchenko, MD, PhD9, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, MD, PhD10, David T. Rubin, MD, FACG11, Brian Bressler, MS, MD12, Axel Dignass, MD, PhD13 1Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; 2Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; 3INFINY Institute, FHU-CURE, INSERM NGERE, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Lorraine, France; McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada, Nancy, Lorraine, France; 4Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; 5Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA; 6Janssen Research and Development, Spring House, PA; 7Mater Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; 8The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Mazowieckie, Poland; 9National Medical University, Kyiv, Kyyivs'ka Oblast', Ukraine; 10Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; 11University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, IL; 12University of British Columbia, IBD Centre of BC, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 13Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany
Introduction: The Phase 3 QUASAR Maintenance Study evaluated the efficacy of maintenance treatment with subcutaneous (SC) guselkumab (GUS), a dual-acting IL-23p19 subunit inhibitor, in patients (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC) who achieved clinical response following IV GUS induction treatment. Here, we report Week (Wk) 44 efficacy and safety results for GUS treatment compared with withdrawal (placebo) by history of treatment with biologics/Janus kinase inhibitors (BIO/JAK).
Methods: At maintenance baseline, clinical responders to 12 wks of GUS IV induction from QUASAR Phase 2b and Phase 3 induction studies (NCT04033445) were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 200mg SC q4w, GUS 100mg SC q8w, or PBO (GUS withdrawal). The primary analysis population included randomized and treated pts in the Maintenance Study with a modified Mayo score of 5-9 at induction baseline. Key clinical, histologic, and endoscopic efficacy endpoints and safety events were evaluated through Wk44.
Results: Of the 568 pts included, 240 (42.3%) had a history of inadequate response or intolerance to BIO/JAK (BIO/JAK-IR) and 309 (54.4%) were BIO/JAK naïve, At induction baseline, BIO/JAK-IR pts had longer disease duration (mean 9.94 vs 6.25 yrs) and more severe endoscopic disease (Mayo endoscopic subscore[MES]=3, 79.6% vs 56.7%) compared with pts with no BIO/JAK history.
Among both the BIO/JAK-IR and naïve subpopulations, higher proportions of GUS-treated pts achieved the key efficacy endpoints at Wk44 compared with withdrawal pts (Table 1). The proportions of pts who met the key endpoints at Wk44 were generally higher in the BIO/JAK naïve subpopulation compared with the BIO/JAK-IR subpopulation across treatment groups, however, treatment differences were generally greater in BIO/JAK-IR pts. Among the anti-TNF-IR, vedolizumab-IR, or tofacitinib-IR pts, higher proportions of GUS-treated pts achieved the key endpoints at Wk44 compared with withdrawal pts (Figure 1). Through Wk44, adverse events for the BIO/JAK-IR and BIO/JAK naïve subpopulations were consistent with the overall population, and no new safety concerns were identified.
Discussion: Maintenance treatment with both GUS dosing regimens resulted in greater improvements compared with placebo withdrawal across key clinical, endoscopic, and histologic endpoints at Wk44 regardless of prior history with biologics/JAK inhibitors. Safety results for both GUS maintenance dose regimens were comparable across subpopulations by treatment history and consistent with the known safety profile of GUS.
Figure: Figure 1. Key endpoints at Maintenance Week 44 by history of anti-TNF, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib therapy: Primary analysis population. *Nominal P<0.05. **Nominal P<0.01. ***Nominal P<0.001. Denominator is the number of pts who had inadequate response or intolerance to anti-TNFs, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib, regardless of other advanced therapies including adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, tofacitinib, vedolizumab, and their biosimilars. Pts who had a prohibited change in UC medication, an ostomy or colectomy, a dose adjustment (including a sham dose adjustment) , or discontinued study agent due to lack of efficacy or an adverse event of worsening of UC or other reasons except for COVID-19 related reasons (excluding COVID-19 infection) or regional crisis in Russia and Ukraine prior to the Wk 44 visit were considered not to have achieved the endpoint. Pts who were missing one or more components pertaining to a specified endpoint at Wk 44 were considered not to have achieved the endpoint.
Note: The table for this abstract can be viewed in the ePoster Gallery section of the ACG 2024 ePoster Site or in The American Journal of Gastroenterology's abstract supplement issue, both of which will be available starting October 27, 2024.
Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet: AbbVie – Grant/Research Support, Personal fees. Allergan – Personal Fees. Alma Bio Therapeutics – Personal Fees. Amgen – Personal Fees. Applied Molecular Transport – Personal Fees. Arena – Personal Fees. Biogen – Personal Fees. Boehringer Ingelheim – Personal Fees. Bristol Myers Squibb – Personal Fees. Celgene – Personal Fees. Celltrion – Personal Fees. CTMA – Stock Options. Enterome – Personal Fees. Enthera – Personal Fees. Ferring – Personal Fees. Fresenius Kabi – Personal Fees. Genentech – Personal Fees. Gilead – Personal Fees. Hikma – Personal Fees. InDex Pharmaceuticals – Personal Fees. Janssen – Personal Fees. Lilly – Personal Fees. MSD – Grant/Research Support, Personal Fees. Mylan – Personal Fees. Nestlé – Personal Fees. Norgine – Personal Fees. Oppilan Pharma – Personal Fees. OSE Immunotherapeutics – Personal Fees. Pfizer Inc – Personal Fees. Pharmacosmos – Fees. Samsung Bioepis – Personal Fees. Sandoz – Personal Fees. Sterna – Personal Fees. Sublimity Therapeutics – Personal Fees. Takeda – Grant/Research Support, Personal Fees. Tillotts – Personal Fees. Vifor – Personal Fees.
Jessica R. Allegretti, MD, MPH, FACG1, Julián Panés, MD2, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, MD, PhD3, Bruce E.. Sands, MD, FACG4, Shadi Yarandi, PhD5, Kuan-Hsiang G. Huang, MD, PhD6, Matthew Germinaro, MD6, Jia Zhan, PhD6, Hongyan Zhang, PhD6, Jakob Begun, MD, PhD7, Jarosław Kierkuś, MD, PhD8, Tetiana Kravchenko, MD, PhD9, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, MD, PhD10, David T. Rubin, MD, FACG11, Brian Bressler, MS, MD12, Axel Dignass, MD, PhD13. P2580 - The Efficacy of Maintenance Treatment with Guselkumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Phase 3 QUASAR Maintenance Study Results at Week 44 by Biologic/Janus Kinase History, ACG 2024 Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts. Philadelphia, PA: American College of Gastroenterology.